Clair v. Agusta Aerospace Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Antoinette Clair (“Clair”) brought this lawsuit against her former employer, Agusta Aerospace Corporation (“Agusta”), alleging that her employment was illegally terminated as a result of national origin discrimination, in violation of Title VII and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”). 1 Clair also brings claims for a hostile work environment and unlawful retaliation under Title VII. Agusta moves for summary judgment on the grounds that Clair has failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination based on national origin…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McKinnon v. GonzalesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Williams v. Mercy Health SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Edwards v. National Vision, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
- Olick v. Kearney (In Re Olick)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- BROWN v. SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P d/b/a RIVERS CASINO PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.