Legal Opinion
Workers' Compensation Claim of Taylor v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 2003No. 02-186PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] Darey S8. Taylor (Taylor) seeks review of the Office of Administrative Hearings' (OAH) order stating the method for calculating his worker's compensation benefits. The district court affirmed the decision of the OAH. In 1990, Taylor's feet were crushed in a work-related accident that resulted in partial amputation of his left foot. Doctors assessed impairment in the left foot at 75%, for which Taylor received benefits. In 2000, Taylor underwent additional surgery that increased his impairment rating to 83%. Taylor disagrees with the OAH's method of calculating his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Montana Environmental Information Center v. Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Powder River Coal Co. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. ColvinWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Buggy Bath Unlimited, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. GarlWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Adelizzi v. StrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Mountain Cement Co. v. South of Laramie Water & Sewer DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company v. Infrassure, LtdWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. KaczmarekWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.