Powder River Coal Co. v. Wyoming State Board of Equalization
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶1] Powder River Coal Company (taxpayer) challenges the Wyoming Department of Revenue's (Department) valuation of its coal production for ad valorem and severance tax purposes, as affirmed by the Wyoming State Board of Equalization (Board). The taxpayer contends the bonus it paid to the federal government when it purchased the federal coal lease was the same as a royalty and should have been treated as such in the application of the proportionate profits calculation required by the statute and regulations. In the alternative, the taxpayer argues the bonus is an indirect, rather…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
- State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- RME Petroleum Co. v. Wyoming Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Wyodak Resources Development Corp. v. Wyoming Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.