Legal Opinion

Guiel v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

It is admitted that the defendant was on the date alleged the owner of a farm of about six hundred acres, and plaintiff’s intestate resided with his family in a house upon the premises, and that the intestate came to his death by means of falling into a well upon the premises while engaged in an attempt to draw water from the same. It is alleged that his death was due to the unsafe condition of the appliances for drawing water, due to negligence on the part of the defendant in not properly inspecting and repairing such appliances.

The first paragraph of the complaint is as follows: “On and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Kerrains v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Davis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. School District No. 11 v. BatscheMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Trustees of East Norway Lake Norwegian Evangelical Lutheran Church v. FroislieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Muniz v. KravisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Bartolotta v. CalvoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Commissioner of Social Services v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Bank of America, FSB v. FrancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API