Legal Opinion

State v. Siegfried

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 10, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Following a joint jury trial in the Superi- or Court, York County, the three defendants appeal their convictions. James Siegfried appeals from his convictions for assault, class D, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983), gross sexual misconduct, class A, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 253(1)(A) (1983), and rape, class A, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 252(1)(B) (1983). Faron Logenbach appeals from a similar conviction for rape and Paul Meader appeals from a similar conviction for gross sexual misconduct. The appellants claim the Superior Court erred in its ruling with respect to a discovery violation by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. KotsimpulosSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. State v. EarleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. BardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Council on Compensation Insurance v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. State v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. J.F. Singleton Co. v. RushSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. LaneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API