Legal Opinion

Canadian Long Distance Telephone Co. v. Seiber

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This suit was originally instituted in the district court of Hemphill county by C. S. Seiber against appellant and one A. M. Newman to recover upon a promissory note, dated January 13, 1909, in the sum of $2,950, made payable to plaintiff. Plaintiff’s allegation is that the note was the obligation of appellant company, and that its payment was guaranteed by the said A. M. Newman. On a former appeal judgment against A. M. Newman was affirmed, and a judgment rendered upon an instructed verdict in favor of appellant herein was reversed and remanded. 151 S. W. 585. The following statement of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aransas Pass Harbor Co. v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Fort Worth Publishing Co. v. Hitson & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Kincheloe Irrigating Co. v. Hahn Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Scanlan v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Elk Valley Coal Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miller v. Kendall, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  2. Robertson v. City National Bank of BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Brooks v. ZornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Bankers' Trust Co. of Amarillo v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Farmers' Mill & Elevator Co. v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API