Legal Opinion
Donnelly v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0046PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, the motions will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The pro se plaintiff, who describes herself as “a low income person,” represents that she derives her only income “from Old Age Survivors and Retirement pension from the Trust Fund established by Franklin Roosevelt and the Congress of the United States.” Complaint (“Compl.”) at 12. 1 She also states that she receives Supplemental Security Income payments and “is entitled to food stamps and Section 8…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hardy v. Northern Leasing Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hardy v. Joseph I. Sussman, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- White v. Hillcrest Davidson & AssociatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Allen v. AddiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Halim v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.