Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Joseph I. Sussman, P.C.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-2040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [ECF No. 7] and Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside the Entry of Default and Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, Failure to Properly Serve Defendant ], & for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Motion for Sanctions and Attorneys Fees [ECF No. 9]. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will dismiss this action.

I. BACKGROUND

Piecing together the few factual allegations set forth in the complaint along…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tyler v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Alami v. Lincoln Property Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  3. Ferebee v. United Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Boss v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw PittmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  5. Harrod v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API