Legal Opinion
Jones v. Harold Arnold's Sentry Buick, Pontiac
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 3, 2008No. 4328PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This action originated from a workers’ compensation claim filed by Tony Jones (Jones) against his employer, Harold Arnold’s Sentry Buiek, Pontiac, GMC (Employer). Jones argues the Appellate Panel of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Appellate Panel) improperly concluded Employer established the defense of intoxication. We affirm.
FACTS
Jones asserted he suffered compensable injuries to his back and lower extremities as a result of two falls that occurred on May 20 and May 21, 2004. At the time of his alleged injuries, Jones was a car salesman for Employer.
Jones acknowledged an addiction to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Lockridge v. Santens of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Reeves v. Carolina Foundry & MacHine WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Lee v. Harborside CaféCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Zeigler v. S. C. Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Original Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Mungo v. Rental Uniform Service of Florence, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Dozier v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Lee v. Bondex, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.