Legal Opinion

Burchinell v. Koon

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

The only inquiry of any considerable difficulty suggested *464by this record respects the right of the surviving partner of an insolvent firm to execute a mortgage to secure the payment of a firm debt.

It is presented on this state of facts: For some years prior to 1891, A. B. and F. W. Jefferay did business as a firm both in Kansas and in Colorado. While in Kansas their business was of a banking character, but in Colorado, to which they removed prior to 1891, they were carrying on business as merchants and dealers in furnishing goods. This firm first started in that line in Pueblo, where in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Fitzpatrick v. FlannaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Williams v. . WhedonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Emerson v. SenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Roach v. BrannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. HowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Bogey v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Yturriaga v. CobeagaNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People's National Bank v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API