Legal Opinion

Wersal v. Sexton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2010No. 09-1578PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the question of whether three provisions of the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct (Code) unconstitutionally infringe upon First Amendment rights of judicial candidates. Gregory Wersal, a candidate for Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, asserts that the so called “endorsement,” “personal solicitation,” and “solicitation for a political organization or candidate” clauses of Canon 41 are unconstitutional on their face or as applied to him. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court rejected Wersal’s First Amendment claims and granted…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bauer v. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Wersal v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Smith v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
  4. Wersal v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. John Siefert v. James AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API