Legal Opinion

Wersal v. Sexton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2012No. 09-1578PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge, with whom MURPHY, MELLOY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges, join.

Gregory Wersal, a candidate for Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, filed an action challenging three provisions of the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct — the “endorsement,” “personal solicitation,” and “solicitation for a political organization or candidate” clauses — as unconstitutionally infringing on the First Amendment rights of judicial candidates. After the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court1 denied Wersal’s motion and granted summary judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Platt v. Board of Commissioners on GrievancesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. 281 Care Committee v. Ross ArnesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. Robert Winter, Jr. v. Steven WolnitzekCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. In Re Arthur U. San Agustin v. Superior Court of Guam, People of Guam, Real Party in Interest, Masatomo Nadeau, Real Party in InterestSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
  5. Doe v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API