Wersal v. Sexton
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge, with whom MURPHY, MELLOY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges, join.
Gregory Wersal, a candidate for Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, filed an action challenging three provisions of the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct — the “endorsement,” “personal solicitation,” and “solicitation for a political organization or candidate” clauses — as unconstitutionally infringing on the First Amendment rights of judicial candidates. After the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court1 denied Wersal’s motion and granted summary judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Platt v. Board of Commissioners on GrievancesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- 281 Care Committee v. Ross ArnesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Robert Winter, Jr. v. Steven WolnitzekCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- In Re Arthur U. San Agustin v. Superior Court of Guam, People of Guam, Real Party in Interest, Masatomo Nadeau, Real Party in InterestSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
- Doe v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.