Legal Opinion

Wright v. Suydam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1914No. 11664PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered July 30, 1913, upon a trial and conviction of contempt, upon the hearing of a show cause order, in an action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court adjudging the defendant Suydam in contempt for failure to execute a deed in conformity with the court’s decree. The original action was one for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate, and has been twice before this court. 59 Wash. 530, 108 Pac. 610, 110 Pac. 8; 72 Wash. 587, 131 Pac. 239.

On the 2d day of April, 1912, the superior court entered a judgment decreeing specific performance of the contract. This judgment provided that a deed should be executed substantially in the words and figures in the form of deed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lyon v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
  2. Andrew v. AndrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  3. Poland v. PolandWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Holcomb v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Mathewson v. PrimeauWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Pearson v. SchubachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API