Legal Opinion

Parker v. Rampton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1972No. 12494PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiffs allege: that each is the parent of two children; that each has sought sterilization from their physicians, who have refused because of forebodings as to the effect of Sec. 64-10-12, U.C.A.1953. They seek an adjudication declaring that this section does not apply to them, but prohibits sterilization only as to persons whom we refer to herein as the “class of defectives.” The subject is dealt with in Chapter 10, Title 64, U.C.A.1953, which provides for procedures to be followed by officials of certain state institutions for the sterilization of persons who are…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Masich v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. One (1) Porsche 2-Door, I.D. No. 911211026, Title No. PP10026F Bearing Kansas License Plate No. JOR 1652Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. KennedyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Universal Life Church v. UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2002
  4. University of Utah v. ShurtleffDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2003
  5. Buhler v. StoneUtah Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API