Jenkins v. State

1. “In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it maybe inferred that a liquor called for and delivered and paid for as whisky is whisky, and therefore an intoxicating liquor.” Tompkins v. State, 2 Ga. App. 639 (58 S. E. 1111); Lewis v. State, 6 Ga. App. 779 (65 S. E. 842).

*543Decided December 9, 1919. Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Dawson—Judge Edwards. September 5, 1919. R. R. Marlin, Parles & Paries, for plaintiff in error. W. PL. Gurr, solicitor, contra.

2. The special ground of the motion for new trial complains that the court erred in allowing in evidence the following: “I…