Legal Opinion

People v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1996No. C018919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

A jury convicted defendant of six counts of perjury. (Pen. Code, § 118, subd. (a).) On appeal defendant contends the trial court erroneously instructed that the materiality element of perjury is a question of law for the court to decide. In light of a California Supreme Court decision issued while defendant’s case has been on appeal, People v. Kobrin (1995) 11 Cal.4th 416 [45 Cal.Rptr.2d 895, 903 P.2d 1027], this contention is well taken. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we will reverse for this instructional error.

Defendant also contests the warrantless search of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. MunozCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API