Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 2003No. A100659PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Jerry Mark Stewart appeals from a conviction of possession of methamphetamine for sale. Following the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, appellant entered a plea of no contest to the charge. He contends the trial court erred in ruling he lacked “standing” to challenge the search. We will reverse the judgment and remand.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On September 26, 2001, the People filed an information charging appellant with possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378). Shortly thereafter, appellant filed a motion to suppress…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MageeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Joshua Gonzalez v. City of Huntington BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API