Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2006No. ED 84968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Harold Scott (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 Motion for Post-Conviction Relief. In his appeal, Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred when, without an evi-dentiary hearing, it failed to find that the attorney who represented him at his jury trial on the charge of two counts of first-degree robbery, one count of first-degree assault and three counts of armed criminal action, rendered ineffective assistance. Movant specifically contends that his trial counsel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. Rush v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. ALVEY GLEN GALE, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Ryan C. Christian v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API