Legal Opinion

Green v. Vogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The instant appeal presents us with the question of whether a party to an action is automatically entitled to multiple trial preferences pursuant to the grounds set forth in CPLR 3403. We conclude that there is no automatic entitlement to the granting of more than one trial preference per action. Rather, we hold that a Trial Justice may, in accordance with the broad latitude granted by the Uniform Rules for the New York State Trial Courts and in the exercise of sound judicial discretion, facilitate the prompt trial of those actions which present extraordinary or…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Morris Electronics of Syracuse, Inc. v. Stereo East Developments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Ocera v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stralberg v. MauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Peck v. Brookdale Hospital Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. White v. Metropolitan Opera Assns., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  4. White v. Metropolitan Opera Assns., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  5. Cruz v. Integrated Health Administrative Services, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API