Legal Opinion

Ocera v. Solomon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Special Term improvidently granted plaintiffs’ motion for an accelerated trial date based on the advanced age of the defendant. CPLR 3403 (a) (3) requires that the movant demonstrate *629by a showing of unequivocable proof that the anticipated lag in reaching trial is likely to cause unusual hardship. The plaintiffs’ speculative assertion that the defendant will not survive the trial date if the case is heard in the usual order is not supported by medical opinion or testimony. Moreover, the defendant was fully deposed at an examination before trial. The circumstances are not sufficiently unusual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris Electronics of Syracuse, Inc. v. Stereo East Developments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Rothschild v. Carolina Coach Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. VogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Rago v. Nationwide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API