City of Marysville v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
The City of Marysville refused to pay funds allegedly owed to the Public Employees' Retirement System on the grounds that the payments were unconstitutional as violations of article 8, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution, prohibiting a gift or loan of the City's credit. This position was sustained by the trial court. We reverse, finding no constitutional prohibition applicable in this case.
In January of 1960, the City of Marysville was admitted as a participating employer in the Public Employees' Retirement System, commonly called PERS. Eleven years later, in October of 1971, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Hart v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Rands v. Clarke CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Graham v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Retired Public Employees Council v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Seattle-King County Council of Camp Fire v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.