Legal Opinion
Rossi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1926No. 7468-7473PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENYON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in error for convenience will be designated as defendants. Two sets of cases are involved. Nos. 7468, 7469, and 7470 were contempt proceedings under section 24, chapter 85, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 315, Comp. Stat. l§ 10138y2ll). In these eases defendants were found guilty of violating an injunction issued under section 21 of said act (41 Stat. 314 [Comp. Stat. § 10138% jj]) against property known as the “Moonlight Ranch” in Arapahoe county, Colo. Defendants Manlio (or Mike) Rossi and Caroline Rossi were each sentenced to be confined…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Street v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Faubus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. v. MolyneauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Briggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Lipscomb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.