Legal Opinion

Briggs v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1930No. 5809PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Briggs appeals from an order “padlocking” (title 27, § 34, USCA) his eafe-caba.retnight club in Detroit. Proofs were taken in open court, and a duly settled narrative statement of evidence is returned.

This is an equity proceeding. The recent Supreme Court rule (Equity Rule 70%, June 2, 1930 [28 USCA § 723]) requires that the trial judge make findings of fact and law. Lacking any exposition of that rule by the Supreme Court, we do not understand that it contemplates, in the ordinary equity case, all the proceedings and formalities which attend such findings in suits at…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Street v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Herbert v. Shanley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  5. Pape ex rel. Pape v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Addis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  4. Harris v. MorseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. Society of European Stage Authors & Composers, Inc. v. New York Hotel Statler Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API