Legal Opinion
Arrington v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 17, 1965No. 203PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMooRB, J.
Plaintiff’s argument for reversal of the superior court judgment is but an elaboration of the reasoning, conclusions and findings contained in the following excerpts from the opinion and award of the Full Commission:
“Over the years the Commission has awarded compensation for disfigurements for loss of internal organs or loss of use of said organs when the outward observable blemish or mark was negligible or almost non-existent. Awards have been made in many cases for the loss of the senses of taste and smell as disfigurement. Admittedly there has been some question as to the Commission’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Stanley v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Marshburn v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Harrell v. Harriet & Henderson YarnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Cates v. Hunt Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Cloutier v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.