Cloutier v. State
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
At the outset we note that the plaintiff has not made any argument that there was error in the Industrial Commission’s finding of fact or award as to the disfigurement to the plaintiff’s head. We affirm this portion of the opinion and award.
As to the other features of this case, we hold the Industrial Commission failed to make sufficient findings of fact for us to determine whether the rights of the parties were properly determined. See Thomason v. Cab Co., 235 N.C. 602, 70 S.E. 2d 706 (1952) and Morgan v. Furniture Industries, Inc., 2 N.C. App. 126, 162 S.E. 2d 619 (1968). The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vaden v. DombrowskiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Aderholt v. A.M. Castle Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Bess v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Aderholt v. A.M. Castle Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Bess v. Tyson Foods, IncorporatedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.