Legal Opinion

McConnell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1928No. 5157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was adjudged guilty upon two counts charging the unlawful sale of narcotics. The sufficiency of the indictment is not questioned, and there is no record of either the evidence or the instructions. The sole contention is that the trial court erred in denying a motion for new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

The motion was supported by the affidavits of three persons, who say they have knowledge of certain facts therein set forth and would give testimony accordingly; but what relation such testimony would have to the evidence upon which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Rinker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Rimmerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  5. Brownlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McElheny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  2. Allred v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API