Legal Opinion

Rimmerman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1911No. 3,396PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Edward Rimmerman and another were convicted of using the United States mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

WM. II. HUNGER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma for a violation of section 5480 of {he Revised Statutes, as amended March 2, 1889 (25 Stat. 873). The indictment, though not skillfully drawn, in substance, charges defendants with having devised a certain scheme and artifice to defraud one John R. King, which scheme and artifice to defraud was to be effected by opening correspondence and communication with said King by means of the post office establishment of the United States. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Hansen v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Rinker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Lemon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Sykes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  5. Salerno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API