Legal Opinion

Application of Jean Druey and Paul Schmidt

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 27, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

Appellants seek reversal of the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of one claim in appellants’ application1 entitled “New Amino-Benzene Sulfonamide,” as. unpatentable over the prior art. Six claims directed to the method of producing the compound, defined by the rejected claim, were allowed.

The remaining claim reads:

“11. A member selected from the group consisting of 3-amino-2-phenyl-pyrazole and acid addition salts thereof.”

The invention, which is used as an intermediate in the preparation of a sulfa drug, has the following structural…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of SchechterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Application of FinleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  4. Parker v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. In re GyurikCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Application of Minoo Dossabhoy MehtaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API