Legal Opinion
Dudley v. Perkins
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
An extra allowance may be made in a “ difficult and extraordinary ” case. Civ. Prac. Act, § 1513. “ In construing this phrase we must give to the words 1 difficult and *497extraordinary ’ their usual and accepted meaning.” Standard Trust Co. v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 178 N. Y. 407, 410; Campbell v. Emslie, 188 id. 509. The difficult and extraordinary character of the case may consist of difficult and extraordinary features either of law or fact. Frey v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 114 App. Div. 623.
This case involves a claim for commission under a contract relating to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swan v. StilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Vilmar v. . SchallNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Standard Trust Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- General Railway Signal Co. v. CadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Frey v. New York CentralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ciufo v. CiufoNew York Supreme Court · 1946