Legal Opinion
Baker v. Tate
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 19, 1914No. 2889PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from County Courts Seminole County; T. S. Cobb, Judge. Action by H. M. Tate, executor of the estate of Dinah Johnson, deceased, against J. A. Baker. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PIARRISON, C.
This was an action by PI. M. Tate, as executor of the estate 'of Dinah Johnson, deceased, against J. A. Baker as attorney for the heirs of deceased, to recover the sum of $750 alleged to have been collected for said heirs by J. A. Baker as their attorney and not paid ovef to said executor. The issues involved are briefly stated in the pleadings, the petition being as follows:
“Plaintiff states that he is the duly qualified and acting executor of the estate of Dinah Johnson, deceased, and as such brings this action against said defendant, and for cause of action plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marbourg v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Nesbit v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Boyd v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- City of Atchison v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- First Nat. Bank of Wetumka v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Oklahoma Coal Co. v. HaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- State v. Pioneer MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Charles v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.