Legal Opinion
C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 20, 1992No. 91-5154PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. (CBC) appeals from the September 18, 1991 decision of the United States Claims Court granting summary judgment to the United States. C.B.C. Enters., Inc. v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 187 (1991). The Claims Court held that CBC was not entitled to use the Ei-chleay formula to calculate extended home office overhead on a 24-day extension of contract performance. We affirm.
I
In September, 1989, CBC contracted with the United States Navy to build certain improvements to a Marine Corps Air Station building at Cherry Point, North Carolina. The original…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Capital Electric Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Luria Bros. & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Williams Enterprises, Inc., and Strait Manufacturing and Welding, Inc. v. The Sherman R. Smoot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brooke Persinger v. Southwest Credit Systems, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Abrogina v. Kentech Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Arianna Marino v. Aven Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Cebrynski v. Wells Fargo Bank NADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Cebrynski v. Wells Fargo Bank NADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.