Legal Opinion
McBroom v. Ethicon Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 29, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02127Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 No. CV-20-02127-PHX-DGC 9 Amanda McBroom, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Ethicon, Inc.; and Johnson & Johnson, 13 Defendants. 14 15 This products liability action involves pelvic mesh devices made by Defendants 16 Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. Plaintiff Amanda McBroom received implants of 17 Defendants’ devices and claims they are defective and caused her serious injury. Plaintiff 18 filed suit in 2015 as part of a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) proceeding in West Virginia. 19 Doc. 1; see In re Ethicon,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Estate of Manuel Diaz v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.