Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cavanaugh

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1926PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J. —

The petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the respondent in the city of St. Louis. By agreement of the parties, service of the writ and the production of the body of the petitioner were waived. The respondent filed his return setting up the reasons for holding the petitioner in custody.

There is no disagreement as to the facts'in the case. The petitioner was arrested for driving his automobile in the city of St. Louis in disregard of an automatic-stop' signal at Fourteenth and Locust streets, and for going in the wrong direction on St. Charles-…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Merchants Exchange v. KnottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Hays v. City of Poplar BluffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  4. City of St. Louis v. KellmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. State Ex Rel. Rothrum v. DarbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API