Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Kellman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 18, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

the city courts of St.'Louis, upon the following complaint or information:

“Harry Kellman, •

To the City of St. Louis, Dr.

“To $200, for the violation of an ordinance of said city, entitled: ‘Ordinance in revision of the general ordinance of the City of St. Louis,’ being general ordinance No. 28646, Chapter -, Article -, Sections 17 to 37 inclusive, approved March 30, 1916 in this, to-wit:
“In the City of St. Louis and State of Missouri, on the 30th day of July, 1917, the said Harry Kellman did then and there operate and conduct a dairy and selling milk without a permit from the Board of Public…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. State v. BockstruckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Ex Parte CavanaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Lux v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. City of St. Louis v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Knese v. KinseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API