Legal Opinion

Quinonez v. Does 1 through 5

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 29, 2023No. 3:22-cv-03195Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RENE QUINONEZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03195-WHO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 64, 65 Defendants. 11 12 13 The defendants, the United States of America and four United States Postal Service or 14 Postal Inspection Service employees, Jeff Agster, Eva Chan, Mark Hodges, and Robin Lee (“the 15 individual defendants”), again move to dismiss claims brought by plaintiffs René Quiñonez and 16 Movement Ink LLC (“Movement Ink”),…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API