Legal Opinion
United States v. Sumpter (In Re Sumpter)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 3, 1991No. 19-20418PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ARTHUR J. SPECTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.
The United States of America (the government) sued for an order denying Jerry L. Sumpter (Mr. Sumpter) and Santina M. Sumpter (Mrs. Sumpter) their bankruptcy discharge or, alternatively, for an order determining that their debt to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is excepted from the discharge. The following constitute my findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052.
Statement of the Case
On September 27, 1989, the Sumpters filed their voluntary petition for…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Khalil v. Developers Surety & Indemnity Co. (In Re Khalil)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nof v. Gannon (In Re Gannon)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Nisselson v. Wolfson (In Re Wolfson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Ransier v. McFarland (In Re McFarland)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Buckstop Lure Co. v. Trost (In Re Trost)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.