Legal Opinion
Lexington Insurance v. Forrest
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 6, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-4435PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXPLANATION AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
On July 8, 2002, plaintiff Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”) filed suit against defendants David Forrest (“Forrest”) and T. Beauclerc Rogers, IV (“Rogers”). In its five-count complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendants, by and through various companies under their control, conspired to defraud Lexington of millions of dollars in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (Counts I — III), and that they also committed common law fraud (Count IV) and tortious interference with…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Astropower Liquidating Trust v. Xantrex Technology, Inc. (In Re Astropower Liquidating Trust)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- International Business Software Solutions, Inc. v. Sail Labs Technology, AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Impress Communications v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Hare v. Starr Commonwealth Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Argos v. ORTHOTEC LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.