Legal Opinion
Argos v. ORTHOTEC LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 8, 2004No. CIV.03-0757-SLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 25, 2003, Association européenee des groupes d’études pour l’ostéosynthése rachidienne (“ARGOS”) filed a complaint against Orthotec, LLC alleging cybersquatting in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d), based upon Orthotec’s registration and use of the domain name argos-us.com. 1 (D.I.l) ARGOS is a corporation organized under the law of France. (Id. at ¶ 1) It is a non-profit membership organization that functions to promote and facilitate applied research in spinal surgery. (Id. at ¶ 6) Orthotec is a limited…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ace Capital v. Varadam FoundationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Tsoukanelis v. Country Pure Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- Vitaworks IP, LLC v. Glanbia Nutritionals (NA), Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023