Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Schwartz

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 19, 1940No. File 58564Published

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This action was brought under the “Unfair Sales Practices Act”, sections 922e to 924e inclusive of the 1939 Supplement to the General Statutes, alleging that the defend' ants, owners and operators of a grocery store and meat market and carrying and selling at retail a full line of meats, groceries, vegetables and allied food products, advertised and offered to sell and sold at retail Oxydol, Crisco, Campbell’s Tomato Juice, and four other products, at less than cost to the defendant re' tailers with intent to injure competitors or destroy competition and that the plaintiff, a competitor, has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beach v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Brush v. Sixth Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Ortman v. GreenmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API