Legal Opinion

Moulton Cavity & Mold, Inc. v. Lyn-Flex Industries, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 26, 1979PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELAHANTY, Justice.

Defendant, Lyn-Flex Industries, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered after a jury trial by the Superior Court, York County, in favor of plaintiff, Moulton Cavity & Mold, Inc. The case concerns itself with an oral contract for the sale of goods which, as both parties agree, is governed by Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 11 M.R.S.A. §§ 2-101 et seq. For the reasons set forth below, we agree with defendant that the presiding Justice committed reversible error by instructing the jury that the doctrine of substantial performance applied to a contract for the sale of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. Blue Rock Industries v. Raymond International, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. Bowen v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Ingle v. Marked Tree Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lidstone v. GreenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Ramirez v. AutosportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Astor v. Boulos Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Alaska Pacific Trading Co. v. Eagon Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Fitzgerald v. HutchinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API