Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A. v. Boykin
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice PLEICONES:
We granted certiorari to review an en banc Court of Appeals decision 1 which held that petitioner “failed to present competent evidence to show that the North Carolina [default judgment it obtained against respondents] was entitled to full faith and credit.” Law Firm of Erickson, P.A. v. Boykin, 375 S.C. 204, 375 S.C. 204, 651 S.E.2d 606 (Ct.App.2007). We reverse.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
South Carolina has adopted a modified version of the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, codified at S.C.Code Ann. §§ 15-35-900 through -960 (2005 and Supp. 2008). Pursuant to §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cook v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Security Credit Leasing, Inc. v. ArmalyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ware v. WareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Pitts v. FinkCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- In Re KellettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Digital Ally, Inc. v. Light-N-Up, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014