Legal Opinion

Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A. v. Boykin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 27, 2009No. 26694PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

We granted certiorari to review an en banc Court of Appeals decision 1 which held that petitioner “failed to present competent evidence to show that the North Carolina [default judgment it obtained against respondents] was entitled to full faith and credit.” Law Firm of Erickson, P.A. v. Boykin, 375 S.C. 204, 375 S.C. 204, 651 S.E.2d 606 (Ct.App.2007). We reverse.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

South Carolina has adopted a modified version of the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, codified at S.C.Code Ann. §§ 15-35-900 through -960 (2005 and Supp. 2008). Pursuant to §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cook v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Security Credit Leasing, Inc. v. ArmalyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ware v. WareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Pitts v. FinkCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. In Re KellettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Digital Ally, Inc. v. Light-N-Up, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API