Legal Opinion
Pitts v. Fink
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 24, 2010No. 4706PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.
In this appeal challenging the enforcement of an Alabama default judgment in South Carolina, Chad Fink asserts the circuit court erred in denying his motion for relief from judgment, arguing the judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm. 1
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This action to domesticate an Aabama default judgment stems from a dispute over funds loaned by Patricia and Robert Pitts (Mr. and Mrs. Pitts) to Fink, Charles Hobbs, and Barton Pitts pursuant to a loan agreement. The $455,000 loan was in furtherance of the business interests of Roundabout Plantation, an Aabama…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hidria, USA, Inc. v. DeloCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- Ware v. WareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Digital Ally, Inc. v. Light-N-Up, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014