Wrenn v. Wrenn
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Justice.
Wrenn Brothers, a partnership at will, was composed of the appellant and the respondents, all of whom are brothers. The partnership agreement rested in parol and there was no provision for dissolution. The business grew in about ten years from a very small beginning into a relatively large plumbing and heating contracting business with contracts in several states which aggregated millions of dollars. Appellant and respondent, A. Earl Wrenn, were active as superintendents of construction while respondent, George M. Wrenn, was and is the office manager and he prepared and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. CooleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Lyles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Allen v. CooleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Whilden v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Kennedy v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Burton M. Cooper v. Leslie A. IsaacsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Vasiliades v. VasiliadesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Klatt v. WallingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006