Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Hill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 6, 1911No. 8006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Klugh, J., September, 1909, and Ernest Moore, Special Judge, January, 1910, York. Action by Chris. L. Kennedy and Porter B. Kennedy, formerly members of Hill, Kennedy & Company, against W. L. Hill. Both parties appeal.

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., September, 1909, and Ernest Moore, Special Judge, January, 1910, York. Action by Chris. L. Kennedy and Porter B. Kennedy, formerly members of Hill, Kennedy & Company, against W. L. Hill. Both parties appeal. Mr. Marion cites: Recitals as to amount contributed to partnership capital may be explained: 22 Ency. 86; 86 Ind. 503. Partnership accounting: 22 N. Y. 178; 10 Rich. 64. Interest on partnership account: 22 Ency. 125-6 ; 3 Mason 284. Mr. Hart cites: Contribution to capital stock may be inquired into: 22 Ency. 86, 71; 33 S. C. 179.

1Opinion of the Court

September 6, 1911. The opinion of the Court was delivered by In this action for the dissolution and settlement of a partnership between the plaintiffs and the defendant, a receiver was appointed on account of irreconcilable differences and disputes between the partners, and the assets are now in his hands. The questions to be determined relate to the distribution of the assets between the plaintiffs and the defendant. The record contains two reports of Mr. J. Lyles Glenn as referee, decrees by Judge Klugh and Special Judge Moore, and numerous exceptions to these reports and decrees. We shall…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weeks v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Tevander v. RuysdaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  3. Karres v. PappasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Wrenn v. WrennSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API