Legal Opinion
Rise v. Bordner
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 22, 1905No. 467PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On involuntary petition, answer, and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
The depositions which have been taken are directed to whether or not the alleged bankrupt was a farmer, but it is a question whether that issue is properly raised by the pleadings. It is not stated in the petition what was his occupation, nor is it negatived that he was principally engaged in farming, one or the other of which was called for. In re Taylor, 4 Am. Bankr. Rep. 515, 102 Fed. 728, 42 C. C. A. 1; In re Bellah, 8 Am. Bankr. Rep. 310, 116 Fed. 69; In re Mero, 12 Am. Bankr. Rep. 171, 128 Fed. 630; In re Callison, 12 Am. Bankr. Rep. 344, 130 Fed. 987; In re…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re MackeyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1901
- In re BellahDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1902
- Mattoon Nat. Bank of Mattoon v. First Nat. Bank of MattoonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- In re DrakeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1902
- In re MeroDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chudnov v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- In re SutterDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
- Ochoa y Hermano v. Otero y HermanoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1922