Legal Opinion

In re Mero

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 18, 1904No. 1,219PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On creditors’ petition for adjudication.

1Opinion of the Court

PLATT, District Judge.

The important parts of the petition are as follows:

“And youy petitioners further represent that said John O. Mero is insolvent, and that within four mouths next preceding the date of this petition the said John O. Mero committed an act of bankruptcy, in that he did heretofore, to wit,
“(1) On the 18th day of January, 1901, suffer and permit, while insolvent, Robert II. Nesbit and Stephen J. Warner, two of his creditors, to obtain a preference through legal proceedings, to wit, by allowing said creditors to obtain a lien for ill30.00 on two horses, a wagon, coach, harness,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re EmslieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Plymouth Cordage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Kemp Lumber Co. v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. In re McGrawDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1918
  4. In re FranklinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1907
  5. In re SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API