Legal Opinion
Slangal v. Getzin
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 29, 1993No. 7:CV92-5014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STROM, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Filing No. 21), plaintiffs’ objections to the report and recommendation and for de novo determination (Filing No. 22), and plaintiffs’ motion for recusal of Judge Strom pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455 (Filing No. 23).
Motion for Recusal
The Court will first address plaintiffs’ motion for recusal. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for recusal in which they claim that certain rulings of the Court in two prior actions were unconstitutional and void and did not properly apply controlling law.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Ndremizara v. Swiss Re America Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Glick v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- McPhail v. First Command Financial Planning, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Muhammad v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.