Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Murray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1923No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStesre, J.

A bill in equity was filed by the attorney general in the circuit court of Ingham county asking permanent injunction to restrain defendant from maintaining an alleged nuisance consisting in an encroachment of a building upon a public street of the city of Mackinac Island, on the Island of Mackinac, in the county of Mackinac. Defendant made a motion in the nature of a demurrer to dismiss the bill on jurisdictional grounds, which was denied, and the proceeding appealed to this court for review.

Introductorily the bill describes the location of the island of Mackinac, having upon it a State park…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neal v. GilmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Nolan v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Township of Lebanon v. BurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hinckley v. DennisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Attorney General v. HaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. King v. FriarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API