Legal Opinion

Hinckley v. Dennison

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1912No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Livingston; Miner, J. Bill by E. Wray Hinckley, highway commissioner of the township of Hamburg, and others, against James Dennison for an injunction to prevent defendant from obstructing a public highway. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

The bill of complaint was filed in this suit to restrain defendant from closing a road extending in an easterly and westerly direction across his farm of 80 acres, which is described as the E. £ of the N. E. J of section 11 in Hamburg township, Livingston county. Complainants are the commissioner of highways and township board of said township.

The issue in this case is whether this way is a legal highway, open to public travel, or a private road. It is *362undisputed that the road was originally opened and used, in the early settlement of that locality, as a private road by two pioneers named…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neal v. GilmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Mt. Clemens v. Mt. Clemens Sanitarium Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snow v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Reno v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Attorney General v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API