Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. King v. Friar

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1933No. 22639PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This is an action for injunction filed in the district court of Ottawa county, by the state of Oklahoma, on relation of the Attorney General, against Tessie Friar and J. F. Irby, to enjoin them from constructing a filling station in such manner as to encroach upon State Highway No. 66, in the incorporated town of Afton. After a hearing the court denied the application for injunction, from which ruling the state has appealed. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The action was filed at the direction of the State Highway Department. It is alleged that State…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smith v. McDowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. First National Bank v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. State v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. City Council v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Price v. TravisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. King v. McCurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. In Re Block 1, Donly Ht. Add., Okla. CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. JohnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Buffalo v. Arkansas State Highway Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API